How are social change and changes in knowledge linked?

It get out therefore proceed by discussing aspects of genial change in history, in particular how changes after the 2nd man war ch exclusivelyenged old and tralatitious systems of intimacy. In this banter this essay will digest on two prevalent systems of fellowship, treat and faith, and in what government get alongncy the changing role of women in hostelry has ch totallyenged these intimacy systems. With regard to godliness this essay will likewise discuss the development of novel age beliefs in todays company with relevance to the dubiousness is religion in radioactive decay? This essay will aim to use relevant examples in this discussion in order to reach a conclusion of the link amid well-disposed change and changes in noesis in our inn.So lets start up by answering the question what is experience?All friendship is produced, collected, collated and disseminated by human bes living in societies. (Goldblatt 2000). It is inherited by bureau of the la nguage we assume in our passing(a) cognises. We use some an(prenominal) different sources of experience in order to understand where weCome from, who we argon and the confederation in spite of appearance we live it shapes what we know and what we dont know.It is the social structures and institutions deep down society, which shape the content of knowledge systems, be it in practice of medicine, religion, the political ideologies and so on. They decide who holds the power in inwardly these knowledge systems. They determine, for example, who has access to specialized knowledge languages (like medical exam training) and who has socially pass and legal billet to realise pronouncements on a given subject.(Goldblatt 2000). deflection from specialized or quick knowledge there is also a different type of knowledge know as common aesthesis knowledge. This is knowledge, which we all inherit or learn from family and friends, or acquire through outside influences accessible to us such as media or the Internet. It helps us understand or gain resource knowledge on issues such as our health for example. It often comes in the shape of old wives tales, which wealthy person been passed down through generations.The dominant knowledge systems such as medicine religion and so on argon non fixed until now and when social change occurs, they are forced to respond to these changes, and in essence it is also knowledge that can then influence change in society and determine how we live our lives.Throughout history society has seen many radical changes within its dominant knowledge systems. Wehave witnessesed major advances in scientific research, medicine, changes in traditional religious beliefs and argufys to the dominant political ideologies, particularly pursuit the Second World War.One of the foremost debates today is whether or not there has been a decline in the aver of expert knowledge within all aspects of society. on that point have always been ex perts with specialized knowledge even in ancient periods. However years ago experts in their field be it perception, medicine or religion were always trusted their knowledge was respected and believed as true, scientists, doctors, priests and the like. Although they were never completely unchallenged the authority of their knowledge was secure. However it could be argued that at this time people had no way of acquiring the knowledge to know any different and had no reason to challenge the experts.In time however new discoveries in science, medicine, and with new communication technology evolving all the time in all aspects of society, allowed people much more access to alternative knowledge and information. With this new knowledge people began to ask questions and have their say regarding issues of importance to them. likewise new experts were emerging all the time to challenge old knowledge systems. Debates that were once confined to a small circle of influential figures and in stitutions within each of these traditions are now amplified throughthe enormously expanded means of communication that now exists (Goldblatt 2000)It could be jolly to argue then that it is not so much that there has been a decline in the trust of experts but that the old and traditional and trusted knowledge systems have effect more diverse due to the emerge of alternateforms of knowledge within society, for example, alternative medicine, new political ideologies and so on.Following the 2nd populace war feminism had a huge impact for women in all spheres of society. acquirement, medicine and religion, had generally been dominated by men throughout history. Women had been bewitching much excluded from all these dominant knowledge systems. It was men who held superior patriarchy power within all aspects of society. This allows us then to not single question and discuss gendered knowledge but to also visit at the interrelation between knowledge and power within these knowledg e systems.Lets look at the at a feminist approach adopted by Fox Keller, with relevance to womens place within medical science. She argues that knowledge mathematical product is gendered and shaped by patriarchy within social structures in society. advanced(a) science is based on a division of emotional and reason labour in which objectivity, reason and mind are cast as male and subjectivity, feeling and nature are cast as female. acquirement involves a radical separation of subject and object and ultimately the supremacy ofmind over nature. The result is a popular conception of science one that is more suited to men than women. (Fox Keller).An example of this is the Royal alliance founded by Charles II in1662. It was argued that the knowledge produced within this society was because of its gentlemanly origins. They maxim the importance of objective knowledge over subjective knowledge within the field of science and medicine. Womens knowledge at this time was devalued and re legated to crime syndicate medicine (Thompson and woodward 2000).It was due to the fact that women were excluded from higher education and therefore unable to see to it medical universities, hence were unable to enter the medical field without training. magnate over Knowledge was used to maintain a structure in which women were systematically excluded from a male medical monopoly (Thompson and Woodward) Today however, due largely to the emerge of feminism, women now have equality with men in the medical profession, and other dominant knowledge systems such as religion.As with medicine religion too was dominated by the patriarchy power within society. In fact it wasnt until 1992 that women were finally accepted into the priesthood.In contemporary society women have challenged the patriarchy of old and traditional religious beliefs in choose of new understanding of religion and what itmeans for them. Many women now focus on a more spiritual beliefs, one front consecrate to this is that of eco-feminism.Eco-feminism is a new term for an ancient wisdom. As women in unhomogeneous movements ecology, peace, feminist and especially health re observe the independence and connectedness of everything, they also discovered what was called spiritual dimension of life the realization of this interconnectedness was itself sometime called spiritualism.The desire to recover, to regenerate this wisdom as a means to eject women and nature from patriarchal destruction also motivated this turning towards spirituality.(Mies and Shiva, 1997, p,500).So it is fair to argue that due to social change brought about by the emerge of feminism women have challenged both gendered knowledge and the power of knowledge in medicine and religion.The rise of Eco-feminism however is just one of the many alternative or new age beliefs within religion today. Which begs the question of religion in contemporary society and whether it is in decline. Or could it be that as with the knowledge s ystem of medicine or expert knowledge in general, religion has become so diverse due to social change and the emerge of alternative religious beliefs brought about because of these changes.Religion has changed significantly throughout history. Following the emerge of the Royal Society and theintellectual movement throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, known as The Age of Reason, (Enlightenment), it was argued that Science replaced religion as the dominant source of knowledge(Woodward and Watt 2000)However religion has always played an important role for people within society due to the fact that unlike scientific knowledge it is religion, which helps us make sense of the moral issues that, can affect us in our daily lives.Social scientists debate into the question is religion in decline is known as the secularization thesis. Some argue that it is modernization, which is a threat to traditional religious thinking by citing new age beliefs as being responsible for this. Some argue that people now fill their time with other leisure activities instead. It is also argued that other forms of thought have interpreted over religion such as science for example. The fact also that the UK is now a multicultural society means there are many diverse forms of religion apart from the church of England.There are two main approaches in this debate positivist, whose approach is based on observing peoples behaviour toward religion. They use quantitative evidence such as questionnaires and surveys, which is argued may be limiting.The interpretative approach however would argue reality cannot be observed in the same way as objects. There aim is understand what religion or peoples beliefs mean to them and aim to look for those meanings from different perspectives.It can be argued that religion in contemporary society has become a significantly diverse knowledge system. Ethnic beliefs, womens challenge to patriarchal religion and the emerge of new age beliefs, be it alternative medicine or green issues have meant that the traditional Church of England the dominant form of religion any more.So in conclusion then this essay began by defining what is knowledge. It then proceeded by questioning expert knowledge with regard to social change. It then focused on two dominant knowledge systems medicine and religion and discussed how the emerge of feminism challenged the knowledge systems. Lastly it discussed briefly the role of religion in contemporary society and questioned whether it is in decline and the relevance of womens, ethnic and new age beliefs. It is fair to argue that the discussion in this essay does conclude that there is a significant link, not only between social change and knowledge but knowledge and social change.