A Look At Cheap Amusements Essay -- essays research papers

An extremely raise, nevertheless ever-contradictory sociological domain of sexual relationsis presented in the Kathy Peiss book seamy Amusements . The reason I recount that it is ever-contradictory is that the arguments are presented for both the benefit of cheap amusements for a woman s place in society and for the reinforcement of her place. In one breath, Peiss says that mixed-sex playing period could be a source of autonomy and pleasure as intumesce as a cause of a woman s continuing oppression. The following arguments impart show that, based on the events and circumstances described in Cheap Amusements , the changes in theways that leisure time time is spent by women has hence benefited them in both the workplace and at home. This put down requires a close-set(prenominal) look at specific leisure activities where and with whom they are spent, and the ultimate motion that these activities had on society and gender roles. More signifi passeltly however, is how the es tablishment of leisure activities for women came about, rather than the simple change in availability of such activities. startle let s look at Peiss s position on the matter of how cheap amusements challenged gender traditions in the late 19th and first 20th centuries.What does Peiss have to say about women s roles at the duty tour of the century? Peiss argues initially that young women experimented with new cultural forms in monetary value of sexual expressiveness and social interaction with men, linking heterosocial culture to a sense of upstart individuality and personal style. Creating this style was an assertion of self. Peissquickly discounts these assertions by verbalize that without economic independence, such freedoms are hollow. Peiss s essay claims to focus on the role of working women in fostering change from a homosocial to a heterosocial culture, but as we can look into from the earlier quote, there is motionlessness what seems to be a hint of male dominance i n preventing the ascertain of true leisure. By this we can see that Peiss believes women were challenging gender norms, but doing so under the implied watchful eye of the male-dominated culture.One very interesting point that Peiss makes is that there is now a commercialise for leisure time. This market included such activities as attending shows at a nickelodeon, travel the trolley, and, especially in Manhattan, spending the day at Coney Islan... ...not explicitly challenging the social conditions of the day, but implicitly doing so. I agree with Peiss s statement that women were expressing the aspiration for selfhood and fulfillment but that this did not elbow grease to read the web of gender and class relations in which they were situated. Women did not attempt to challenge their situation explicitly, nor didthey even realize they were challenging their social condition. At the same time, attendance at particular popular dance halls and beau monde events served to reinforc e the notions of female submission and some Old Word traditions. Overall, however, we can see that the changes in society over this period of 1880-1920 benefited women. Look at how family life changed because of the movie theater experience. It brought families together hubbys and wives would attend with their children. Also, we can see that clubs and dances were safe places to meet those of the opposite sex, whereas previously, you may have had a husband chosen for you. It can be said with confidence then that the challenges implicitly mounted by women s search for leisure has indeed benefited their position in the late 19th and early 20th centurysociety.