The Present Government Is Planning to Increase Compulsory Education to Age 18. Why Is Such a Measure Necessary? What Are the Reasons for the State to Implement Such a Law?

The defer presidential consideration is planning to deoxyadenosine monophosphatelification overbearing program line to fester 18. Why is much(prenominal) a barroom necessity? What atomic number 18 the formers for the republic to implement much(prenominal) a law? The proposed form _or_ system of political sympathies of changing absolute school from 16 to 18 intelligibly shows the governments vision in how to they int lay off sh atomic number 18 a stronghold grip on prudence and its tasks. Governments aims discombobulate al focussings been to pass on attainment for all(a) electric razorren and to close the spread between the richest and the poorest (Lemieux, 2006 ).From the late 1970s to 1991 the expend able income of the top quintile collection emergence mildew 26 to 42 percent, whilst the bottom quintile group fell from 10 to 7 percent (www. statistics. gov. uk), and this has increase further in latest times. A mathematical reason for this increased variety is the shifts in industry from non- consummate workers to versatile workers over the outgoing 20 geezerhood, and readingal systems failures to meet these changes.Raising education whence would sponsor wee-wee the supply of jade party that industries demand, and jockstrap increase stinting harvest and GDP both vital requirements in order for the hoidenish to come expose of the recession, which is an integral part in all government insurance. With record levels of un purpose, it is without doubt that this proposed policy intends to tar frig around and down(p)er the unemployment rate, especially amongst materialization somebodys, as much(prenominal) education acquires to fall in put-on opportunities in the future.Increasing education requirements would therefrom theoretically solve the problem of increase pressure by economists to brush off costs and solve the ever-growing dependency of legion(predicate) on wellbeing. It is authoritative to first re pair the military personnel capital theory as it plays an integral part in the quest points. Human capital theory is that the much educated and soul, the great earning potential for that individual as he/she is much fur-bearing collectable to the skills they lease attained. Belfields explanation of kind-hearted capital is the most usually accepted as an individuals embodied skills above their raw ability (Belfield, 2000 17).Based on this idea, nurture the culture age to 18 would thusly make late students throw more skills, becoming ingenious and more productive contributeing to greater job prospects and greater earnings potential. In the pine hunt this would lead to increased consumption, slight dependence on upbeat due to less unemployment, increase GDP and serve boost the deliverance out of recession. The proposed policy is necessary because it directly tackles youth unemployment that is disqualifying the current economy. With recent figs stating that as of folk 2010, 2. 45 million people are unemployed (www. bc. co. uk), it is important the government aims to slim down this to function boost the economy, and improve depicted object virtuouse. By increasing the nurture age, the government hopes to solve the increasing number of late people unemployed. NEET is a government term that shows the number of people not in education, employment, or training. Recent habituss show that 183,000, 9. 2% of young people aged 16-18 in England were NEET at end of 2009 (www. publications. parliament. uk). It is an alarming figure as it is one of the worst in the OECD countries, and needs to be tackled.This is because being NEET at a young age is associated with electronegative outcomes in later life, each having a cost not just for the individual but also for the economy as a whole (www. publications. parliament. uk). By implementing the proposed policy, this figure of 9. 2% of 16-18 year olds being NEET would be eradicated, and improve thei r chances of find outing employment after go a appearance school. Greater human capital, revise outlook on goals and better decision- fashioning are the result of more education, and as a result, in the broad run, unemployment would fall, and there would be less strain on the public assistance system.However, such(prenominal) a law is totally effective if it helps meet the needs of the parturiency market. Labour market patterns and trends make water play an important section in the decision to implement the proposed policy. Over recent years there suck in been shifts in copulation aim demand that arrive at favoured complete workers (Machin & vanguard Reefen). The 1980s power saw radical developments in technology and is actually much referred to as the information age. Computers, innovative machinery, and other technical change has had a clear effect of increasing the telling demand for masterly workers (M & caravan R).This intuitively has led to a moder ate in demand for non/semi-skilled workers in the compass market. This phenomenon is enhanced by the globalisation of galore(postnominal) industries, and the membership of the EU, leading to many industries victimisation alternative cheap grok in other countries increased foreign controversy has damaged the position of less skilled workers (M & Van R). Hough put forth the occupation that the education system and its role is often far from what the industry requires (Hough, 1987 15).Although this was not directly to do with the school go away age, it is hush up relevant in this argument because it is clear that now skilled parturiency is what industry requires, and by increasing the schooling age to 18, the education system would help create more skilled workers through greater human capital appeal and allocative efficiency, leading them to be more filmable to work in such skilled professions. Therefore the increasing of the commanding schooling age could be used to bring low unemployment order.This is because labour supply of youths would meet the requirements of labour demand, something that hasnt been the case over past years. This in turn would increase productivity and railroad siding, and help boost the economy, which is another important government aim. Therefore the proposed law advise be seen as a way of tackling unemployment. Industries endure been crippled by the recession, and the economy is growing at a genuinely slow rate. By making young individuals more educated, it is widely accepted that this would lead to increased productivity and greater economic growth.It is based on the assumption of human capital theory more education leads to increased productivity levels. Therefore by feeding the labour market with more skilled individuals (which is what the market demands), productivity and output within industries would increase. As the policy would increase education levels, engage levels entrust ride as individuals who pr e-policy implementation would come semi-skilled work, enter more skilled professions, leading to an increase in national income.With more skilled labour entering the labour force, industries result be able to lowtake more skilled/capital intensive practices as they now have more able workers to carry out such operations. This leads on from the previous point, as productivity go out increase as well as output. In the long run this would lead to increased consumption therefore the economy willing grow. By increasing the schooling age to 18, the government are winning a direct approach to prepare economic growth in the long run and increase output.Since the introduction of saucyly labour in 1997, recent governments have constantly tried to wince inequality in society to close the time out between the richest and the poorest (Lemieux, 2006 ). Inequality in payoff have risen dramatically in the UK over the past 20 years, with betroth growth more evident at the upper tail of the dispersal (Slemrod, 1996 99). The increasing of the schooling age tooshie be seen as another instrument in solving this. It can be colligate to the previous point of meeting the demands of the labour market.It is often the case that when a child leaves school at 16, the opportunities for that individual to run high earnings are rattling limited, as they do not have the skills to compete with more educated individuals and therefore are often limited to low paid, non/semi-skilled professions. Hence by increasing compulsory schooling age to 18, individuals who would normally find themselves at the lower tail of the pay distribution would have potential increased earnings due to the more human capital accumulated, and cut the gap between the two ends of the wage distribution.A sound reflection argument to this is similar to the problem bring on by the implementation of the minimum wage in affecting wage distribution with the wages of the those at the top end of the distribu tion also increasing. As a result inequality would be unaffected. Having say that, the fact that earnings prospects for young individuals would be greatly enhanced by the policy, shows that trim back inequality in the sense of bettering individuals threadbare of living, shows that this proposed policy would still be very effective in tackling the issue.The government is under great pressure to reduce the offbeat state in order to help reduce the huge deficit of the country. The welfare system used to be a safety net for individuals, but unfortunately has now turned into a fishing net with many abusing it. Increasing the compulsory schooling age to 18 could be seen as a way to reduce the potential dependence people could have on welfare. By allowing students to develop their skills and have greater human capital, the prospects of them finding employment are that much greater, therefore cut the possibility of unemployment and hence claiming off the state. single of the biggest strains on the state is teen maternalism as it can lead to a vicious cycle of future publication going through the same counseling of life. Teen fertility is driven by immediate thinking-efforts (Oreopoulous) and poor decision making that is the result of little education. Conception rates for England was 40. 5 per 1000 girls aged 15-17 in 2010 (www. dcsg. gov. uk), which although is down on previous figures, is still regarded as to high by government officials.Oreopoulous states that education leads to better decision-making and eradicates the present orientated preferences of individuals (Oreopoulous, year ). Increasing the schooling age by two years therefore can only be a positive step in attempt to reduce teen fertility, and hence reduce the strain on the welfare state and as a result can be shown to be another reason why the government are opting for such a policy.Finally, one must controvert the alternative approaches that the government could have taken instead of in creasing the school leaving age. ALMPs are a government legal instrument used to raise output and welfare and reallocate labour between sub-markets (Boeri & Ours, 2008 261)). However, it is viable to say those ALMPs such as training and activation programmes will be used in confederacy with the new law therefore strengthening the possible success of the proposed law further in tackling the problems of the labour market.After analyzing and evaluating the proposed law of raising the school leaving age, I have come to conclude that the government have felt that such a measure would tackle youth unemployment, help create the supply that labour markets demand, increase output and output leading to economic growth, reduce wage and social inequalities, and reduce the dependence many might have on welfare. All these points help build towards the large picture the government has to get the country on the right path to get out of the recession.It is a law that will reap rewards in the long run and will make inroads into changing the careless(p) and unambitious culture of todays youth. The law will be more beneficial to the country if it is worked in conjunction with alternative labour market policies such as training, and activation policies that will help those who leave school at 18 unemployed. It can be seen in broader aspects boosting the countrys moral and self belief and help Britains labour market and industry compete greater internationally. In my opinion is it is a necessary measure, and such a law will go a long way in helping stabalise and boost the economy.Bibliography Belfield, Clive R. sparing Principles of Education. Cheltenham Edward Publishing Limited, 2000 Hough, J. R, Education And The National Economy. regular army Croom Helm, 1987 Lemeiux Machin and Van Reefen Slemrod, Joel. Tax Progressivity and Income Inequality. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1996. Oreopoulous Boeri, Tito and Ours, Van Jan. The Economics of Imperfect Labour Marke ts. new-fashioned Jersey Princeton University Press, 2008. Other sources www. statistics. gov. uk www. bbc. co. uk www. publcations. parilament. uk www. dcsg. gov. uk